Tacky, but . . .

Iconographically correct, if that's supposed to be a rooster. From the earliest days, Christians have viewed the rooster as a symbol of the call of Christ, signaling a new dawn for humanity.  If you Google "rooster as Christian symbol," however, you will find a number of alternatives to this interpretation, both positive and negative. That is typical of the medieval world view, which saw all things as symbols with multiple meanings that could be viewed "in bono" or "in malo" (for good or for evil).

From a graphic design perspective, I think they need to make the rooster a bit more abstract (since the cross itself is stylized) and lose the fish. Via Locusts and Honey

Rob says, If the chicken was fried it would be a Baptist church. I say, If the fish was fried it would be a Catholic church. That's one of the ways you can tell the difference between denominations.

Comments

[Rob B.]

Now if the chicken was fried, it would be a Baptist church.

[gail]

And if the fish was fried it would be a Catholic church.

[Ana]

Webber grill, skewer, fish, chicken. Phoenix and Dragon combo at the Mongolian grill.

[gail]

Speaking of skewers, you know those rotisserie chickens they sell at the grocery? Both my children at different times asked me if the hole was "where they shot the chicken."

[Ana]

With a canon.

That reminds me of that story about testing airplane engines by shooting chickens into them with a chicken launcher. They forgot to defrost the chickens and were really curious about the trouble the engines were having passing that portion of the test.

[Rob B]

So, who get's the T-bone?

[anon]

I can't resist;

And if the cross were fried, it would be a mosque.

[cgm]

Could it be the cock that crowed 3 times before morning?