« The door is open . . . | Main | Waiter! There's a snake in my soup. »

Comments

CraigC

He wasn't exactly the first to use chiaroscuro, as I'm sure you know. The renaissance painters really made it popular, and in film, it and the use of shadow had been done plenty in film noir. Frankly, I find Bergman boring and pretentious.

gail

There's a certain look to a Bergman image though -- combination of chiaroscuro, greys, and shadows that is very characteristic of him. I love his visual images, not so much his stories.

gail

The way the right side of the hood makes it look like part of the face was cut away, for instance. That's classic Bergman.

CraigC

I agree, his images really jump out at you.

gail

Especially in the black and white films. I don't feel he was ever able to capture it in color.

CraigC

All I was saying is that the concepts weren't original. I know you weren't implying that, and you're right, he took them and amplified them into striking images. And the films themselves are stultifyingly boring. I was probably spurred to say something negative just because I've always been annoyed that he was such a darling of the critics. He's the poster child for artists who are adopted by the coffee-house set so they can feel superior to the riff-raff.

gail

Woody Allen's pseudo-Bergman stuff drove me nuts.

Jakira Kurosawa

You do know that Bergman just copied that Knight & Death playing chess stuff from Bill & Ted's Bogus Journey dont you? I think that on whole Twister is a far better metaphor for life than Chess.. but that's just me...

The comments to this entry are closed.